Starship 36 Explosion Shakes Whole Starbase City, Debris Thrown 200 Meters from Blast Site! How Dangerous Was this Accident?

Starship 36 explosion sends debris over 200 meters, highlighting the high risks of rocket testing. Learn how dangerous it was and what caused it.

Shockwave from Starship 36 explosion shakes Elon Musk’s Starbase facility during test failure.
Starship 36 explodes during test flight, causing tremors across SpaceX’s Starbase in Texas.

Starship 36 Explosion Shakes Starbase, Debris Thrown 200 Meters from Blast Site

Starship 36 explosion A powerful explosion during the test flight of Starship 36 sent shockwaves through Elon Musk’s Starbase facility in Boca Chica, Texas. The violent failure occurred during a critical phase of the launch sequence and led to a destructive blast that physically shook buildings and equipment across the sprawling private spaceport.

Engineers and staff on site reported feeling the ground tremble beneath them as the fully fueled Starship vehicle erupted in a massive fireball. The explosion, which followed a suspected failure during stage separation or upper-stage ignition, was among the most forceful seen at Starbase to date. The sound was heard miles away, and the blast’s impact was felt across much of the surrounding area.

One of the most dramatic outcomes of the explosion was the scattering of large debris. A portion of Starship’s nosecone was reportedly thrown more than 200 meters away from the main blast site. Such a distance highlights the extreme power of the detonation and raises important questions about the size of the exclusion zone around the launch pad.

Though the site is designed to handle test anomalies, the strength of the explosion will likely prompt a fresh safety review by SpaceX and regulatory agencies. The Federal Aviation Administration is expected to conduct an investigation into the incident to determine the cause and ensure safety compliance before further launches proceed.

No injuries were reported when Starship 36 explosion, as the area had been cleared before the test flight in accordance with standard procedures. However, the sheer force of the blast and the scattering of debris underscored the risks involved in launching a fully fueled Starship-Super Heavy system. The rocket carried thousands of tons of liquid methane and liquid oxygen, which contribute to the intensity of any failure.

Starbase is central to Elon Musk’s long-term vision for interplanetary space travel. It serves as the main development and test center for SpaceX’s Starship program, a key component of future missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. The Starship system is designed to be fully reusable and capable of carrying both cargo and crew, making it one of the most ambitious spaceflight programs in history.

While this incident represents a significant setback in the short term, it also provides SpaceX engineers with valuable data. Explosive failures, while dramatic, are part of the iterative development approach SpaceX has long adopted. Each test brings the company closer to refining the technology and achieving full mission success.

The Starship 36 explosion marks a high-profile moment in SpaceX’s ongoing efforts, not just for the destruction caused, but for the scale of its impact across the Starbase site. As development continues, the company will need to balance the speed of innovation with reinforced safeguards to protect both personnel and infrastructure.

News Source:-

https://x.com/SpaceXNewsTX/status/1936441111733821942?t=40nzCFti4EBTThOLaJdQsQ&s=19

https://x.com/interstellargw/status/1937188820992106674?t=R-TmrWmbi690ADumyckJVg&s=19

How Dangerous Was the Starship 36 Explosion?

1. Power of the Blast

The explosion of Starship 36 involved a fully stacked Super Heavy booster and Starship upper stage. Together, they contain over 4,800 tons of liquid methane and liquid oxygen—an extremely powerful combination. The blast likely released energy equivalent to tons of TNT, enough to cause major damage within a wide radius.

2. Flying Debris

One of the most alarming outcomes of the explosion was that a fragment of the nosecone was reportedly thrown over 200 meters (656 feet) away. A piece of metal traveling at high velocity can be lethal. If people had been in the wrong place—such as outside a safety perimeter—serious injury or death could have occurred.

3. Shockwave and Thermal Effects

Such an explosion generates a shockwave strong enough to damage equipment, crack windows, or cause injury to anyone too close. It also produces extreme heat and fire hazards at the launch site.

4. Environmental and Structural Risk

The explosion could have damaged launch pad infrastructure, ignited brush fires, or introduced toxic fumes into the air. The surrounding environment, including wildlife and nearby buildings, could be impacted.

5. Range Safety and Risk Management

Thankfully, the explosion happened in a controlled test environment at SpaceX’s Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas. Strict range safety protocols and exclusion zones likely prevented harm to personnel. These protocols are designed to withstand such scenarios, though the debris distance may prompt reviews of the safety zone sizes.


Why Did It Happen?

While the exact cause of the explosion is still under investigation, early observations suggest a failure during stage separation or a malfunction in the propulsion system. Starship 36 was part of SpaceX’s test series to refine the architecture for future orbital missions and eventual crewed flights.


Starship 36 Explosion: At a Glance 

  • The Starship 36 explosion was extremely powerful and potentially hazardous.
  • A nosecone fragment flying over 200 meters shows how violent the blast was.
  • No injuries occurred, thanks to strict safety protocols.
  • The incident reinforces the need for robust risk assessments and flight termination systems in large rocket testing.

Venturi Space Reveals- Mona Lena Lunar Rover: Europe’s Bold Step Toward the Moon

Amazon’s Project Kuiper Satellites: Is Jeff Bezos Going To Competite With Musk? Atlas V Successfully Launches Second Batch

ULA’s Atlas V rocket launched Amazon’s Project Kuiper satellites second batch Today, on June 23, 2025. Learn how this mission boosts Amazon’s global satellite internet network.

Atlas V rocket launches Amazon's Project Kuiper satellites into low Earth orbit from Cape Canaveral on June 23, 2025
United Launch Alliance’s Atlas V rocket lifts off carrying the second batch of Amazon’s Project Kuiper satellites for global broadband internet ( Photo credit ULA).

ULA’s Atlas V rocket deployed Amazon’s Project Kuiper satellites into Space

Cape Canaveral, FL — June 23, 2025
United Launch Alliance’s (ULA) Atlas V rocket successfully lifted off at 6:54 a.m. EDT (10:54 UTC) from Cape Canaveral Space Launch Complex-41, carrying the second group of satellites for Amazon’s Project Kuiper—a mission known as Kuiper-2. This marks another significant step in Amazon’s long-term plan to build a global broadband internet constellation.

The Kuiper-2 mission follows the inaugural launch of Kuiper satellites in 2023, reinforcing Amazon’s commitment to deploying over 3,200 satellites to provide affordable, high-speed internet to underserved and remote regions worldwide. With today’s deployment, Amazon continues to build momentum toward its goal of deploying half the constellation by 2026, as mandated by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

The Atlas V 501 rocket, known for its precision and reliability, was selected for its ability to deliver payloads into mid-inclination orbits required for the Kuiper network. This launch demonstrated ULA’s capability to meet Amazon’s requirements for safety, accuracy, and schedule performance.

Today’s launch concluded without any reported anomalies. The live coverage of the countdown and liftoff ended shortly after orbital insertion was confirmed.

Amazon’s Project Kuiper aims to compete with SpaceX’s Starlink and other satellite internet providers. Unlike Starlink’s lower orbits, Kuiper satellites are positioned at various altitudes to optimize coverage and latency, with focus areas including the Americas, Europe, Africa, and parts of Asia.

More launches are planned throughout 2025 and 2026, with multiple launch providers including Blue Origin, Arianespace, and ULA tasked with delivering the remaining payloads into orbit.

ULA confirmed deployment of satellites on X.

All Kuiper 2 satellites have successfully deployed into space! Congratulations to Amazon and the Project Kuiper team and thank you for again entrusting United Launch Alliance and the Atlas V rocket to deliver.


What Is Amazon’s Project Kuiper?

Amazon’s Project Kuiper is a multibillion-dollar initiative to build a low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellation designed to provide high-speed, low-latency broadband internet to underserved and remote communities across the globe. The project will deploy 3,236 satellites in LEO at altitudes ranging from 590 km to 630 km.

Led by Amazon subsidiary Kuiper Systems LLC, the project is similar in ambition to SpaceX’s Starlink and OneWeb. Project Kuiper aims to support educational institutions, emergency responders, rural communities, and businesses that lack access to reliable connectivity.

Amazon has committed over $10 billion to the project and has already built a dedicated satellite processing facility in Florida, a ground network, and custom-designed terminals for end-users. These terminals are expected to be compact, affordable, and easy to install, making them ideal for home, business, and government use.

Kuiper satellites are built with advanced propulsion, power systems, and onboard processing technology. Amazon also plans to integrate Kuiper connectivity into its broader ecosystem—supporting services like AWS cloud infrastructure and Alexa-enabled devices.

To meet regulatory deadlines, Amazon must deploy at least 1,618 satellites by July 2026, which is why launches have now accelerated through multiple launch providers including United Launch Alliance (ULA), Blue Origin, and Arianespace.

News Source:-

https://x.com/ulalaunch/status/1937107462265450954?t=nWkzLRcWNnKM5QiOIbrxOQ&s=19

https://x.com/ulalaunch/status/1937118674499874819?t=X2Z780bbK_gwFZPNqlgSmg&s=19


FAQs About Project Kuiper

What is Project Kuiper’s main goal?

Project Kuiper aims to provide global broadband internet coverage, especially in areas where traditional fiber or cable internet is unavailable or unreliable.


How many satellites will Kuiper launch?

Amazon plans to launch 3,236 satellites into low Earth orbit, with at least 50% to be operational by mid-2026, as required by the FCC.


How fast is the internet from Kuiper expected to be?

Amazon has not released full commercial specifications, but test models have shown speeds of up to 400 Mbps with low latency—comparable to high-end fiber services.


How does Kuiper compare to SpaceX Starlink?

Both are LEO satellite constellations offering broadband internet.

  • Starlink is ahead in deployment with over 6,000+ satellites already in orbit.
  • Kuiper is still in its early phases but plans to leverage Amazon’s cloud infrastructure, logistics, and e-commerce scale to gain competitive advantage.

Who is launching Kuiper satellites?

Amazon signed launch contracts with:

  • ULA (using Atlas V and upcoming Vulcan rockets)
  • Blue Origin (Jeff Bezos’ company, using New Glenn)
  • Arianespace (using Ariane 6)

These represent one of the largest commercial launch agreements in history.


When will Kuiper internet be available to customers?

Service is expected to begin in late 2025 or early 2026, after a critical mass of satellites is operational. Amazon will begin beta testing with selected users before public rollout.


Will Kuiper integrate with AWS or other Amazon products?

Yes. Kuiper is expected to work in tandem with Amazon Web Services (AWS) to power cloud-based applications, IoT systems, and remote enterprise services.


What equipment is needed to use Kuiper internet?

Users will need a Kuiper terminal, which Amazon says will be compact and affordable, similar in size to a pizza box. It includes a flat-panel antenna and built-in modem.

SpaceX’s Big Competitor Makes Entry-Amazon’s Kuiper Satellite Launch on June 16: A Major Step in the Race Against Starlink

 


Rocket Launching Vs Weather:  How Cloud and Wind Conditions Impact Rocket Launches

Rocket Launching Vs Weathermay appear smooth and predictable, but behind every successful liftoff lies a complex system of planning, especially when it comes to weather. The Earth’s atmosphere presents a number of challenges that can affect a rocket’s performance and safety. Understanding how weather and wind conditions influence space missions is essential to grasp why launches are often delayed or rescheduled.

Rocket Launching Vs Weather-Rocket standing on launch pad under cloudy sky before launch.
Photo shows Rocket Launching Vs weather A launch vehicle awaits liftoff as thick clouds gather overhead at the space center (photo credit ULA).

Rocket Launching Vs Weather: A Key Factor in Launch Success

Space agencies like NASA, SpaceX, and Blue Origin closely monitor weather patterns before every launch. Meteorological teams track various atmospheric conditions — not just at the launch pad, but also at different altitudes and, for reusable rockets, at landing zones as well. Here’s a detailed look at how each weather factor can influence a mission:


Rain and Lightning: Natural Threats

Rain alone may not always delay a launch, but when combined with thunderstorm activity, it becomes a serious risk. One of the most well-known examples of this was Apollo 12 in 1969, when the rocket triggered a lightning strike shortly after launch. This event led to the establishment of strict guidelines to avoid flying near storm clouds or active lightning.

Today, if lightning is detected within 10 nautical miles of the launch site, the countdown is automatically paused. Thick clouds, especially cumulus and anvil clouds, are also monitored, as they can carry electrical charges that may affect the rocket.


Wind: Ground-Level and High-Altitude Concerns

Wind conditions are critical both on the ground and in the upper atmosphere.

Surface Winds

Strong winds at the launch pad can destabilize the rocket before it even leaves the ground. If winds are too intense, they may push the rocket off-center during liftoff, risking damage or mission failure. Rockets are designed to withstand certain limits, usually up to around 30–40 km/h (18–25 mph) at ground level.

Upper-Level Winds

Winds in the upper atmosphere can be even more dangerous. These high-speed jet streams can cause wind shear — sudden changes in wind direction or speed — which can alter the rocket’s flight path. If these conditions are detected through weather balloons or satellite data, the launch is typically postponed until conditions improve.


Temperature and Icing Issues

Both extreme heat and cold can affect a rocket’s systems. Cold temperatures can cause fuel lines to freeze or metallic components to contract, making them brittle. On the other hand, excessive heat can lead to over-pressurization in fuel tanks or overheating in onboard systems. Ice formation, particularly on cryogenic fuel tanks, can also cause mechanical problems during launch.


Weather at Recovery and Landing Sites

With the rise of reusable rockets and capsules, weather conditions at landing or splashdown zones are just as important as at the launch site. For example, SpaceX often delays launches if rough seas or high winds make it unsafe for a booster to land on its drone ship at sea. Blue Origin, which lands its crew capsules on land, also monitors wind speeds at landing areas to ensure a safe return.


Common Reasons for Rocket Launching Vs Weather Delays

Condition Reason for Delay Nearby lightning High risk of electrical strikes and equipment failure Thick storm clouds Increased lightning potential Strong surface winds May destabilize rocket at liftoff High-altitude winds Risk of course deviation and structural stress Extreme temperatures Can affect engine performance and fuel systems Icing on equipment May damage parts or sensors Unsafe landing conditions Affects recovery of boosters or capsules


Rocket Launching Vs Weather: Conclusion

A rocket launch isn’t just about ignition and flight—it’s about timing, preparation, and safety. Rocket launching vs. weather:  is a dynamic and unpredictable factor that engineers cannot control but must respect. Through real-time monitoring and careful planning, space agencies minimize risks and ensure the safest conditions for every launch. So, the next time a launch is delayed, it’s not just a technical issue — it might be the weather deciding whether it’s time to fly.

News Source:-

https://x.com/ulalaunch/status/1542904024449650694?t=w8TxKMIHFySOec-qLdOLsw&s=19

https://x.com/blueorigin/status/1936412783911772252?t=RnDU_XAT_INLgjYPm66rrQ&s=19


Rocket Launching Vs Weather:  (FAQs)

1. Why does bad weather delay rocket launches?

Bad weather, especially lightning, high winds, or heavy cloud cover, can interfere with a rocket’s flight path, cause technical malfunctions, or pose serious safety risks. Launches are delayed to protect the rocket, the mission, and any crew onboard.


2. Can a rocket launch during rain?

Rockets can sometimes launch in light rain, but launches are usually postponed if there is a risk of thunderstorms or heavy rain. Rain can damage sensitive instruments or increase the risk of lightning strikes.


3. What is wind shear, and why is it dangerous for rockets?

Wind shear is a sudden change in wind speed or direction with altitude. It can push the rocket off its planned course, especially in the upper atmosphere, making it harder to control or causing structural stress.


4. Do clouds affect rocket launches?

Yes. Thick cumulus or anvil clouds can hold electrical charges that might trigger lightning strikes when a rocket passes through. These conditions are taken seriously by launch teams.


5. What is the maximum wind speed allowed during a launch?

This varies by rocket type, but surface wind speeds above 30–40 km/h (18–25 mph) often lead to delays. Upper-level winds also have strict limits based on the rocket’s design and mission profile.


6. Why does weather matter at the landing site too?

If a mission involves landing a booster or capsule — like SpaceX’s Falcon 9 or Blue Origin’s New Shepard — the weather at the recovery zone must also be calm and safe. High seas or strong winds at sea or on land can make recovery too dangerous.


7. How is launch weather monitored?

Launch teams use satellites, radar, weather balloons, and ground-based sensors to monitor wind speeds, cloud formations, lightning, and temperature at different altitudes. A dedicated launch weather officer makes final recommendations.


8. Can extreme temperatures affect rocket launches?

Yes. Extreme cold can cause parts to freeze or become brittle, while extreme heat can overheat fuel tanks or internal systems. Most rockets have a safe temperature range for operations.


9. How close can lightning be for a launch to proceed?

If lightning is within approximately 10 nautical miles of the launch site, the mission is usually paused or scrubbed for safety reasons.


10. What happens if weather conditions improve after a delay?

If conditions improve within the launch window, the rocket can still launch. If not, the launch is rescheduled for the next available window, which could be hours, days, or even weeks later.

Incredible! Starlink Connects Over 6M Users Across 140 Countries with High-Speed Internet


Blue Origin Scrubs NS-33 Suborbital Space Tourism Flight Due to High Winds

Blue Origin Scrubs NS-33 suborbital space tourism flight due to high winds in West Texas. Learn why the mission was scrubbed, the crew involved, and what comes next.5

Blue Origin Scrubs NS-33 New Shepard rocket standing on the launchpad at Launch Site One in West Texas before the NS-33 mission.
The NS-33 mission was set to carry six civilians beyond the Kármán line but was postponed due to high-altitude winds ( photo credit Blue Origin).

Blue Origin Scrubs NS-33 Flight Over Weather Concerns

West Texas | June 21, 2025
Blue Origin has postponed its much-anticipated NS-33 mission, which was set to carry six private citizens on a suborbital space tourism flight from Launch Site One in West Texas. The decision was made due to unfavorable high-altitude wind conditions, which posed risks during launch and recovery operations.

The flight was originally scheduled for Saturday morning at 8:30 a.m. CDT (13:30 UTC). No new launch date has been confirmed yet.


About the NS-33 Mission

The NS-33 mission marks the 33rd flight of the New Shepard reusable launch system and the 7th crewed commercial mission. New Shepard is designed to fly above the Kármán line (100 km), allowing passengers to experience weightlessness and view Earth from the edge of space for several minutes before returning safely via parachute landing.


Crew Members on NS-33

The NS-33 flight was to carry six passengers from diverse backgrounds:

  • Mason Angel – Venture capitalist and founder of Industrious Ventures
  • Sylvain Chiron – French entrepreneur and founder of Brasserie du Mont-Blanc
  • Carol Schaller – Retired accountant and lifelong space enthusiast
  • Gopi Thotakura – Indian aviator and wellness entrepreneur
  • Ed Dwight – Former U.S. Air Force captain and America’s first Black astronaut candidate
  • Kenneth L. Hess – Software engineer, entrepreneur, and space education advocate

This mission is especially notable as it includes Ed Dwight, who was selected by President John F. Kennedy for astronaut training in the 1960s but never went to space. NS-33 would mark his historic first flight.


Why Was the Launch Delayed?

According to Blue Origin, high winds in the upper atmosphere made flight conditions unsafe. In suborbital flights, precision during both boost and descent phases is critical, and strong winds can cause trajectory deviations and risk parachute deployment safety.

A spokesperson stated on Blue Origin Scrubs NS-33:

“Out of an abundance of caution for the crew and the recovery team, we are standing down from today’s launch and will reschedule once conditions improve.”


What Happens Next?

Blue Origin has not provided a specific new launch date, but the next attempt is expected in the coming days, pending favorable weather. The NS-33 vehicle and systems reportedly remain in nominal condition.

The launch will be livestreamed on BlueOrigin.com once rescheduled.


Blue Origin and the Future of Space Tourism

Founded by Jeff Bezos, Blue Origin is one of the leading companies in the growing commercial spaceflight industry. With New Shepard, it provides short-duration suborbital flights to the edge of space, targeting researchers, educators, and private tourists.

So far, Blue Origin has conducted over a dozen successful human spaceflights, reinforcing the role of reusable rocket technology in making space more accessible.


Conclusion

The delay of the NS-33 flight highlights the challenges of spaceflight—even in commercial tourism. While weather can be unpredictable, safety remains the top priority. As the spaceflight window reopens in the coming days, the world will be watching to see this diverse crew make their journey to the stars.

Stay tuned for updates on the rescheduled NS-33 launch date and coverage of Blue Origin’s next steps in civilian space travel.

News Source:-

https://x.com/blueorigin/status/1936412783911772252?t=y8VaEAiKsRY6tMesK9-JcQ&s=19


FAQ: Blue Origin Scrubs NS-33 Suborbital Spaceflight


1. What is the NS-33 mission by Blue Origin?

Blue Origin Scrubs NS-33 is the 33rd mission of Blue Origin’s New Shepard suborbital rocket and its 7th crewed commercial flight, aimed at taking six private individuals above the Kármán line (100 km) for a few minutes of weightlessness and space viewing.


2. Why was the NS-33 mission postponed?

The launch was scrubbed due to high winds at high altitude over Launch Site One in West Texas. Strong winds can affect the rocket’s stability and the safe return of its capsule, especially during parachute deployment.


3. When was the NS-33 mission supposed to launch?

The launch was scheduled for Blue Origin Scrubs NS-33 was Saturday, June 21, 2025, with the window opening at 8:30 a.m. CDT (13:30 UTC).


4. Who are the passengers on NS-33?

The six passengers on the Blue Origin Scrubs NS-33 mission are:

  • Ed Dwight – Former USAF captain, first Black astronaut candidate
  • Gopi Thotakura – Indian pilot and wellness entrepreneur
  • Mason Angel – American investor
  • Carol Schaller – Retired accountant and space fan
  • Kenneth L. Hess – Entrepreneur and educator
  • Sylvain Chiron – French brewery founder

5. Was the rocket damaged or delayed for technical reasons?

No. The mission was postponed solely due to weather conditions. Blue Origin confirmed that the rocket and all systems were in nominal condition.


6. Has a new launch date for NS-33 been announced?

As of now, no new launch date has been provided. Blue Origin is monitoring weather conditions and will reschedule once it is safe to launch.


7. Where will the NS-33 flight launch from?

The mission will launch from Launch Site One, Blue Origin’s private spaceport near Van Horn, West Texas.


8. What makes this NS-33 mission significant?

  • Ed Dwight’s participation makes this flight historic, as he was selected in the 1960s but never flew.
  • It’s part of Blue Origin’s effort to expand civilian space tourism.
  • All passengers are non-professional civilians representing various countries and backgrounds.

9. How long does a New Shepard flight last?

The entire suborbital flight typically lasts about 11 minutes, including several minutes of microgravity above the Kármán line and a parachute-assisted landing.


10. How can I watch the launch when it happens?

Blue Origin will provide a livestream on their official website (BlueOrigin.com) and YouTube channel, beginning approximately 30 minutes before liftoff.